COMPUTERS
November 20, 2008 6:00 PM PST

Judge spares E-Gold directors jail time

Posted by Stephanie Condon
  • Font size
  • Print

WASHINGTON--A federal judge decided on Thursday not to impose a prison sentence on the senior directors of E-Gold, an Internet-based digital currency firm, who had previously pleaded guilty to violations of money laundering and running an unlicensed money transmitting business.

The three directors of E-Gold, in addition to its Gold & Silver Reserve parent company, were indicted in April 2007 after federal prosecutors accused the online payment site of being a haven for criminal activity like processing investment scams and payments for child pornography. They said its loose verification standards for users' identity attracted criminals.

The three men and the companies pleaded guilty to the charges in July 2008.

U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer said the men deserved lenient sentences because they did not intend to engage in illegal activity. Even though, Collyer said, the U.S. Justice Department wanted to use the cases to show "this new day of Internet crime is going to be...vigorously prosecuted," that alone was not enough reason to incarcerate the defendants.

Gold & Silver Reserve CEO Douglas Jackson was sentenced to 300 hours of community service, a $200 fine, and three years of supervision, including six months of electronically monitored home detention. He had faced a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison and a $500,000 fine.

Jackson was spared a heavier fine because, according to his attorney, he's deeply in debt. "Dr. Jackson has suffered, will continue to suffer, and may never be successful with E-Gold," the judge said.

Reid Jackson, Douglas Jackson's brother, and E-Gold director Barry Downey were each sentenced to three years of probation, 300 hours of community service. They also were ordered to pay a $2,500 fine and a $100 assessment fee each.

The defendants were also ordered to obtain licenses to do business in the states in which a license is required, something the company had already begun doing. In September, E-Gold hired KPMG to aid its development of an anti-money laundering program; it has already contacted every state to determine whether a license is needed.

E-Gold and Gold & Silver Reserve faced a maximum fine of $3.7 million, but because neither company could pay that much, they were fined $300,000 with the condition that $10,000 be paid on Monday, with further monthly payments to start in May 2009.

Many of E-Gold's users turned to it as an alternative to a bank account denominated in U.S. dollars, which lose money due to inflation especially when interest rates are low. By contrast, gold has zoomed upward from roughly $300 an ounce in 2002 to around $750 an ounce today.

Supporters of E-Gold and gold-denominated accounts have suggested that enabling nearly anonymous transfers of money in and out of the banking system is what led the feds to target the company. For his part, Jackson initially blasted the feds, saying the Secret Service "deceived" a judge with "bogus testimony" so they could conduct a raid on E-Gold designed to put it out of business.

Federal prosecutors claimed there was no doubt the directors knew E-Gold facilitates criminal activity. An analysis in January 2008 of the 65 most valuable E-Gold accounts showed that more than 70 percent were involved in criminal activity, according to Laurel Rimon, a Justice Department prosecutor.

Furthermore, prosecutors said, the funds that flow through E-Gold, which launched in 1996, are significant. At its height, the site had more than 4 million accounts and facilitated more than $5 million fund transfers a day.

Though illegal activity continued on E-Gold well after Douglas Jackson acknowledged the company was under investigation in 2004, the defendants claimed that they received bad legal counsel, which convinced them the site did not have to be licensed as a money transmitting business.

"If he had thought it needed to be licensed, he would have done everything in his power to make that happen," Federal Public Defender Michelle Peterson said about Reid Jackson.

The court also accepted the argument that Downey was unaware of the company's need for a license, even though he is a practicing lawyer.

The defendants also argued they have worked to the best of their abilities to cooperate with investigators, but the prosecutors provided evidence that the directors may have been trying to circumspect government interference.

The company was incorporated in Bermuda, for instance, even though its operations are based out of Melbourne, Fla. Barry Pollack, Downey's defense attorney, said the site's offshore registry did not impede the directors from responding to subpoenas. (If the site had been entirely overseas, as GoldMoney.com is, it wouldn't have had to worry about the feds. On the other hand, GoldMoney does demand proof of identity.)

Douglas Jackson founded the site on a philosophy opposed to government regulation, prosecutors said. "Dr. Jackson was very candid about his vision to create a version of a financial institution that didn't have regulations," prosecutor Jonathan Haray said.

Intentions and philosophies notwithstanding, the defense said, the defendants should remain out of jail so they could keep the site up and running and continue to help investigators track criminals. E-Gold's records of IP addresses and timestamps provide a trail to criminals--and proof the company had no intention of inviting criminal activity, the defense said.

The prosecution questioned how useful E-Gold's cooperation really was.

"The vast majority (of IP addresses from E-Gold) don't have good identifying information," said Rimon. "If an IP address leads to a P.O. box on a street corner in Estonia, that doesn't do us much good, and that's what we found in many cases."

E-Gold remains open for business today, though Jackson said in an announcement on November 14 that it was still figuring out how to comply with the registration process for new accounts now that it's subject to regulation as a "financial institution." New account creation is "temporarily suspended."

CNET News' Declan McCullagh contributed to this report.

Stephanie Condon is a staff writer for CNET News focused on the intersection of technology and politics. She is based in Washington, D.C. E-mail Stephanie.
Recent posts from Politics and Law
Obama urges Congress to postpone DTV transition
Smart grid companies want stimulus cash from feds
'New York Times' API tracks congressional votes
Tech lobbyists: Spend $30 billion in tax dollars, get a million jobs
U.S. Chamber seeks climate solutions from tech sector, not EPA
Yelp user faces lawsuit over negative review
Obama picks RIAA's favorite lawyer for a top Justice post
Obama supporters downplay CTO's near-term role
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 7 comments
by humanssssss November 20, 2008 7:48 PM PST
Does paypal have licenses in all 50 states to operate? I don't see them on their website. I have asked them, they never provide.
Reply to this comment
by wadfi November 24, 2008 9:02 AM PST
I work for a certain States Departmet of Financial Institutions and I can verify that Paypal is registered as an Moeny Servie Business (MSB) and Money transmitter (MT)1 in all 50 states. You can go to any states Banking or Financial Institutions website and verify that, for any MSB or MT in your state or in the state in which you would like to verify licensing. The Washington State website is:

www.dfi.wa.gov (look for the licenssee lookup area)

You can also look for their Federal MSB registration at www.msb.gov
by Harrison912 November 21, 2008 12:19 PM PST
As a web site owner for safety and security products, I'm always glad to see justice done. I didn't think being, "deeply in debt" had anything to do with sentencing. Anyway, I'm glad the feds got a handle on this. We don't need anyone supporting illegal activity.
Reply to this comment
by NoVista November 21, 2008 5:38 PM PST
The biggest illegal activity IS the government and its Department of JustUs. And the Fed and its collection agency, the IRS.
Reply to this comment
by andrewmuck November 22, 2008 2:39 PM PST
So if I read this correct, for the amount of gold the DOJ confiscated off me I could have been running a site like e-gold? Can that 'fine' in advance entitle me to to commit similar crimes or are they going to give it back now they have found someone to take the blame. Dont turn everyone who had value in the system into criminals!
Reply to this comment
by wadfi November 24, 2008 9:03 AM PST
by wadfi November 24, 2008 9:02 AM PST
I work for a certain States Departmet of Financial Institutions and I can verify that Paypal is registered as an Moeny Servie Business (MSB) and Money transmitter (MT)1 in all 50 states. You can go to any states Banking or Financial Institutions website and verify that, for any MSB or MT in your state or in the state in which you would like to verify licensing. The Washington State website is:

www.dfi.wa.gov (look for the licenssee lookup area)

You can also look for their Federal MSB registration at www.msb.gov
Reply to this comment
by PECB November 26, 2008 10:20 AM PST
This is a sad, libelous, and criminal state of affairs (on the part of the U.S. legal system) -- the sentencing nothing more than a smoke-and-mirrors scam by the state (and monied-interests) to try and preserve their power a little longer. I was a major exchanger in the early days of E-gold's operations (for E-gold, and other emerging metal-back e-currencies -- 1999 - 2001), and was raped (metaphorically) by the Feds, and shut down -- with a couple hundred grand "dissappeared" by the SS (Secret Service) and/or other players, and our house in ransacked ruins after the search and seizure of equipment & records (no crime was committed on my part or e-gold's and the Feds dropped the matter, but the damage was done with no recompence -- taking years of recovery). The whole thing was a political-intimidation move by the Federal Government and the Financial Industry. . . . can't have gold and silver being used as money in a convenient, inexpensive fashion, that might provide alternatives to faultering fiat currencies around the world (and e-gold was doing just that).

During the whole mess, I personally warned Mr. Jackson & Friends, on the phone, that they were next -- either in a few months or a few years and that they should either wind-down and close their business or restructure it & themselves out of reach (at least legally, and geographically, but those barriers have never stopped government thugs in the past and the don't now) of our corrupt and evolvingly unconstitutional government. Being a well-meaning idealist, he didn't take the warning seriously and is now paying the price for being an honest businessman, plying a legal trade that is a potential competitor to government force and fraud.

---

Also, since PayPal is mentioned in the comments I will comment on them too. PayPal was started during the same time as e-gold and operated without banking or money transmitter licenses for several years (as did e-gold). At the time, during these early years, PayPal (unlike e-gold) had little to no account security and stole money from it's users left and right (they stole over 14K from me and my clients at the time -- note this is before PayPal was sold to Ebay). The Fed and various state responses to this was various fines , class-action lawsuit settlements, etc... and being told to go forth and do no more, and go get licensed appropriately.

Contrast this with e-gold, whom from the beginning operated their business responibly and ethically, took account security seriously, and did their best to work with regulators (from the start) as to whether or not they needed various permits, licenses etc... but were told they did not (as was I for my operations) and then are later persecuted for not haveing said pieces of paper, even though they had been previously told those papers were not needed.

Why this disparate treatment? One company deals in state fiat currencies and fictional credits; the other company deals in in gold and silver, things of real value -- a potentially direct competitor to fiat currencies. Never mind the fact that gold and silver is constitutional money, while fiat currencies are not.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

Yahoo's Decker strong contender for CEO

Sources say the president of the embattled Internet search pioneer has been through two rounds of interviews with the board.


CES 2009

CES 2009 is in full swing. Highlights so far include Palm's WebOS and Pre device, Microsoft's Windows 7 beta, and much more.


About Politics and Law

Lead contributor Declan McCullagh has covered politics, technology, and Washington, D.C., for more than a decade, which has turned him into an iconoclast and a skeptic of anyone who says, "We oughta have a new federal law against this."

Add this feed to your online news reader

Politics and Law topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right