COMPUTERS
March 13, 2008 11:51 AM PDT

AOL-Bebo: What the Web's saying

Posted by Caroline McCarthy
  • Font size
  • Print

Glancing at the many blog posts about AOL's unexpected acquisition of social network Bebo, there's no real consensus as to whether it's a smart idea. If anything, the collective mood of the Web's talking heads seems to be thus: if AOL can smoothly integrate Bebo with its AIM client and Platform-A ad network, great. Unfortunately, AOL doesn't have that kind of track record.

Perhaps the most optimistic of the bunch was CenterNetworks blogger Allen Stern, who said that this really can't be bad for AOL's advertising arm. "It brings their ad inventory for Platform-A skyrocketing upwards with a youth and young adult demographic," Stern said. "This is a good complement to their current AOL properties which tend to tick a bit further up the age chain."

But Stern also noted some potential snafus: "Yahoo currently serves ads on Bebo, so we will need to see what happens with this relationship."

Clint Boulton at eWeek also gave the deal a thumbs-up, saying that the acquisition will effectively "double" AOL's reach by adding its 40 million members to the 40 million already using instant-messaging clients AIM and ICQ. Plus, there's the technology. "Bebo's gem is Open Media," Boulton wrote in reference to the platform that allows big-media content producers to get their audio and video onto the social network. "Bebo could be what AOL needs to breathe life into its sluggish Platform-A ad platform, which has not paid the dividends the company officials expected since they launched it last year."

All Things D's Kara Swisher wasn't so upbeat, suggesting that AOL had purchased a company with "not a whole lot of revenue and negligible profits" and that perhaps the best part of the acquisition for AOL is Bebo president Joanna Shields: "AOL gets an experienced and savvy Web exec, which it desperately needs these days, given the flux there."

GigaOm's Om Malik called the acquisition "ballsy," considering it's putting so much stake into the uncharted territory of social-media advertising profits--everyone knows by now that MySpace's display ad deal with Google hasn't exactly been a gold mine. "It is even more brave considering how Platform-A has its own management problems...there are reports of AOL slashing half their sales force."

Malik also categorized AOL parent Time Warner's strategy as "schizophrenic," citing simultaneous business decisions that don't really seem to make sense. "Jeff Bewkes wants to get rid of AOL (and Time Warner Cable) and focus entirely on his old, Hollywood-style businesses. Earlier this week he was happy to talk about a deal with Yahoo and get rid of AOL, which is going through a major crisis," Malik wrote. "And at the same time they are spending $850 million in cash on Bebo. Maybe it helps AOL become a more sexy acquisition, or a spin off candidate?"

Henry Blodget of the Silicon Alley Insider agreed that AOL buying Bebo is a risky move, considering the fact that Bebo really isn't a household name in the U.S. "The potential home run here is if AOL can effectively combine AIM, ICQ, and Bebo and accelerate the growth of all three," Blodget wrote. Whether or not they can do that is totally unclear. What the deal does clarify, apparently, is Blodget's theory that Jeffrey Bewkes won't sell AOL any time soon. "We think he'd hit a good bid, if one came along, but one is unlikely to. Our source suggested that Bewkes planned to give AOL until mid-year to prove that its turnaround can work. This acquisition suggests that he is, in fact, committed to doing that."

TechCrunch's Michael Arrington highlighted the fact that Bebo will be closely woven into AOL's existing AIM client, one of the company's most successful products. "AOL is clearly putting a massive effort into transforming the company from a dial up broadband provider into a company that has the competitive fire," Arrington wrote without taking a clear stance on whether the acquisition was a dumb idea or not.

But he ended on an optimistic note: "The company has been releasing genuinely innovative new products and has also made a number of smaller strategic acquisitions over the last year or so. And there are lots more to come, apparently."

So what it all comes down to, really, is whether you have any faith left in AOL.

Read more of News.com's coverage: "What Bebo means to AOL"

Caroline McCarthy, a CNET News staff writer, is a downtown Manhattanite happily addicted to social-media tools and restaurant blogs. Her pre-CNET resume includes interning at an IT security firm and brewing cappuccinos. E-mail Caroline.
Recent posts from The Social
In which Twitter tells me what my landlord can't
JibJab jacks up $7.5 million
Delete 10 Facebook friends, get a free Whopper
Yelp jumps across the pond
At CES, MySpace chats up the Widget Channel
Current Media: Nope, we're not closing an office
Zuckerberg: New year, 150 million Facebook users
Model sues Google over mean, nasty blog remarks
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 3 comments
Could be a good thing
by Pete Bardo March 13, 2008 12:46 PM PDT
If they make it so AOL doesn't suck!

Even with a cable connection, their web pages take so long to load, and consume so much processing power I finally closed my account. It took way too long to get anywhere--and it still does.
Reply to this comment
AOL...
by Kev Orng March 13, 2008 1:05 PM PDT
Amazing AOL is still around. They're a tainted brand as far as I'm concerned. Most people I know (with whom I've discussed AOL anyway) assume when they see an AOL email address that they are dealing with someone over 65 who set up their own internet connection without consulting their kids or grandkids first, or somebody who works for AOL.
Back in the 90s, we used to associate it with "internet newbie" who used the disc they got in the mail by accident, but there aren't so many internet newbies anymore.

Maybe it's just where I live, because "America Online Canada" just always seemed like the ultimate example of one of those companies that thinks it can just cynically slap "Canada" onto the end of their name without otherwise changing any of their marketing strategy/materials at all, which I usually take as a sign that said company takes this market for granted, ergo, screw you, AOL. I don't care what they buy. Thanks for all the free floppies back in the day when floppies were handy.
Reply to this comment
Worth the risk
by Jesse Chan March 13, 2008 9:01 PM PDT
It looks like AOL got Bebo at a reasonable cost-per-user. It's comparable to the News Corp acquisition of MySpace -- they've made all their money back already! http://fishtrain.com/2008/03/13/social-network-valuation/
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

Yahoo's Decker strong contender for CEO

Sources say the president of the embattled Internet search pioneer has been through two rounds of interviews with the board.


CES 2009

CES 2009 is in full swing. Highlights so far include Palm's WebOS and Pre device, Microsoft's Windows 7 beta, and much more.


About The Social

CNET News' Caroline McCarthy is a downtown Manhattanite who believes that, despite popular opinion, the Web can actually help your social life. She's happily addicted to fun social-media tools from Twitter to Yelp to Facebook, sends an inordinate number of text messages, and has a tendency to waste time at the office reading restaurant blogs. Here, she explores all facets of the Web's gregarious side, as well as the unique tech culture in her home city of New York. (Don't call it Silicon Alley.)

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Social topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right