COMPUTERS
February 27, 2008 12:09 PM PST

An LED that can go 80 years on a battery charge?

Posted by Michael Kanellos
  • Font size
  • Print

CORK, Ireland--William Henry, an applications specialist at Ireland's Tyndall National Institute, can't tell you exactly how long one of the miniature LEDs the organization has developed will emit light. But it's a long time.

The micro LED--which is significantly smaller than conventional light-emitting diodes--requires only a few billionths of an amp to operate. Thus, it can survive for quite a while on a limited power source. One of the researchers on the project had one running constantly for two-and-a-half years on his desk. Then someone damaged it while moving it around. One member of the group calculated that it could last 80 years (assuming no accidents) on the power stored in a coin-size battery.

A microLED photographed under a microscope

"We can produce visible light from nanoamps," Henry said.

Miniature is the keyword in the FLAME project, which stands for "future lighting applications for miniature entities." The micro LED measures only 15 microns across, far smaller than the 300 microns of a conventional LED. (A micron is a millionth of a meter).

Smaller devices generally consume less power than larger ones. The device is also more efficient at extracting light from the power put into it than standard LEDs, which means that it also emits less heat. Although the light from LEDs tends to be cool, the back of diodes, which are chips, do get hot. Venture capitalists have been showering the LED industry with investments in the past few years because many believe the chips will replace conventional lights.

Tyndall will initially likely try to market the device as an alternative to lasers, particularly in medical equipment. Lasers are far from perfect. They wear out, they create safety problems for people handling them, and they can also produce heat, a problem when you are trying to harvest or examine fluid or tissue samples from a patient. By contrast, these micro LEDs could be placed at the tip of fiber-optic probes or used inside chips designed for examining blood samples without changing the state of the materials it is studying.

The small size could also open the door to some commercial applications. One idea floating around the lab is to embed these tiny devices into shoes or tickets to prevent counterfeiting. (Pink Floyd put an LED in a CD case once. It flickered on every few seconds to remind you that you own it.)

I asked if I could take a picture of one of the prototypes; instead, I received the official photograph of some of the pixels. A while back, the institute obtained a fancy camera to shoot a picture of a micro LED while it was turned off, but in all of the close-ups it got washed out in the background when it wasn't emitting light. Eventually, they just put it under a microscope and got the image from there.

Recent posts from News Blog
Was InfoWorld's CTO of the Year award a year late?
VMWare VI4 renamed to vSphere
Red Hat's new support product demonstrates subscription value
Teen listens to iPod during brain tumor removal
NASA, Google Maps track Southern California wildfires
Sprint first to offer HTC Touch Pro
Flipping out: RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 debuts
Sprint HTC Touch Diamond outed early
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 7 comments
How bright?
by wrlee February 27, 2008 1:51 PM PST
It is hard to guage the relavence of this news if we do not know how bright the light was.
Reply to this comment
Visibility (with minimal power input)
by Pleun Maaskant March 4, 2008 6:26 AM PST
The main characteristic of the Tyndall device is ?visibility?: the Tyndall light source yields visible light at an input power of just 30 nW.

The light can be discerned with unaided eye under normal room light conditions at a distance of about 1 meter from the source.

A coin battery (CR1620: 16 mm diameter x 2 mm high) has a typical energy content of 7 mA.hour at 3V.

The energy stored in such a battery would cover the power requirement of the prototype light source over 700,000 hours (80 years).

The light source has a high internal conversion efficiency from electricity into light, coupled with low leakage current. Additionally, this light source has the unique feature that it directs the light efficiently towards the viewer, without the need for encapsulants or external optics.
Finally, a world I can live in!
by fokwp February 27, 2008 2:15 PM PST
"One idea floating around the lab is to embed these tiny devices into shoes or tickets to prevent counterfeiting."

So this means that we - or at least our children - will eventually live in a world that's free of counterfeit shoes. After that, let's go after global warming!
Reply to this comment
There is no 80 year battery :)
by hardchemist February 27, 2008 4:48 PM PST
The longest life battery currently available only puts out continuous
power for maybe 10 years tops, assuming a friendly environment.
There is no 80 year battery....

But the point is well taken: the little LEDs could run for 80 years on
the total amp-hours of a typical coin cell, mathematically speaking.
Reply to this comment
Actually....
by moonskin February 28, 2008 5:54 AM PST
That is a misnomer, they don't have a consumer battery that lasts that long. In the medical field they have tested a new type of battery for pacemakers and other implanted devices that have been estimated to run for approximately 40 years.
jgfh
by bexamous February 28, 2008 9:46 AM PST
"The longest life battery currently available only puts out continuous
power for maybe 10 years tops, assuming a friendly environment.
There is no 80 year battery...."

Maybe 10 years?
http://products.panasonic-industrial.com/datasheets/en/Panasonic_Lithium_Handbook_Part1.pdf

After 10 years it'll have 90% capacity still. You can get lithium batteries that will only discharge 0.5% per year. Not rated for 80 years but that's because who really is testing for this?

I see no evidience that 80 years is impossible. And 'maybe 10 years' is obviously wrong. Definitley 10 years at the current rates the article speaks of.
LED TV, no more OLED, LCD, Plasma, DLP
by fred dunn February 28, 2008 4:54 AM PST
If they could get it bright enough then silicon will beat OLED in reliability and MTBF.
As small as those pixels are I would say that it would make a fantastic TV source.
No more backlights or plasma to wear out. LED's are factors quicker than LCD. This really looks promising if they can manufacturr large panels in the familiar HDTV matrix and resolutions.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

Apple: DRM-free tunes, unibody MacBook Pro

roundup At Macworld, Phil Schiller touts 10 million songs sans DRM, plus 69-cent songs, a unibody 17-inch notebook, iLife updates, and more.


Countdown to CES

special coverage The tech community descends on Las Vegas as the Consumer Electronics Show gets ready to kick off in all its gadgety glory.


About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

News Blog topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right