The challenge of algae fuel: An expert speaks
Making fuel out of algae is one of those ideas that everyone loves. An acre of algae can produce 50 times more oil than an acre of soy, estimates John Sheehan, now vice president of strategy and sustainable development at LiveFuels.
"It can produce a lot of oil," he said in an interview on Wednesday.
The oil can be used to make biodiesel or synthetic forms of petroleum or both. Many hope that algae-based fuel can sell for around $40 to $50 a barrel, or a lot less than crude.
Algae facilities can also suck significant amounts of carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. The fumes coming out of utility smokestacks can be piped into algae growing facilities. And to top it off, algae's not a massive food crop at the moment, so you aren't using a valuable food crop to gas cars.
Sheehan's not new to the field. He oversaw biomass, ethanol and algae programs at National Renewable Energy Labs. An NREL paper on algae--along with research from some of the national labs--forms the basis of a lot of the thinking around algae.
Right now, though, no one is producing it commercially. Companies such as LiveFuels, GreenFuel Technologies and Solazyme hope to start seeing algae oil get into the fuel markets in a substantial way over the next few years, but it's still mostly experimental. GreenFuel recently hit some snags and changed CEOs.
One challenge is removing the water. It's not uncommon to have 1 gram of usable algae in every liter of water. "That's 1,000 parts of water for every part of algae," he said.
The industry is also in the midst of a few religious wars. One is controlled versus open ponds. In controlled facilities, engineers can regulate the growth of organisms and control what kinds of species grow in the environment. These facilities cost quite a bit. Controlling the rate of growth can also be a problem.
"Open ponds are the cheapest, simplest solution," he said. "But it is much harder to maintain consistency."
Then there is the question of using biologically enhanced organisms or a mixture of naturally occurring species. Enhanced organisms can produce more oil per cell. However, they may not thrive if foreign species enter the pond.
LiveFuels is an open pond/multispecies company, by the way.
"The issue is: is it doable?" he said. "The question is: can we get the costs down to where it can compete" with fossil fuels?





better than the other biofuels, so its impact on land use might be
significantly less than that of the others. To say "algae's not a
massive food crop at the moment, so you aren't using a valuable
food crop to gas cars" kind of misses the point, though. It does
take space to grow it, and that alone could displace food crops if it
proved to be more valuable than food crops. So, caution is still in
order. Algae doesn't seem to be in any imminent danger of
becoming economic either financially or energetically.
Unnecessary - if the algae is grown in artificial containers, it does not have to be on ariable land. They can be stuck out in the desert or places where the ground isnt good for farming.
But talking about pumping in CO2 for the algae from industry made me think of giant greenhouses sitting midair atop smoke stacks, which has got me wondering if you could stack these things. And how deep can algae live? Would the pond be as efficient at 50 feet deep as at 5? You can't really stack a cornfield.
acre, you'd have to pass a law to keep him from turning fields into
ponds and growing algae. Or perhaps a rice farmer. They already
have "ponds"- I remember hunting ducks on them in the winter in
Texas in the 60s.
production,bioplastics,dyes,feedstock,pharmaceuticals.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algaculture#Pollution_Control
lot of gene combinations already, so what are the chances we could
hit on one that not only has not been tried naturally but could
survive and prosper in the harsh natural environment. Just askin.
Algae uses only a fraction of the water that other crops use (1-2%)
Super algae taking over the world is not the concern... the concern is contamination of the prefered strain of algae you want to grow getting contaminated and out competed by other species of algae that produce far far far less algae oil.
This is why a closed system is likely to win out over open ponds.
Only real problem seems to be harvesting the algae from the water. I find it hard to believe that all the scientist and engineers in the world won't be able to tackle that on problem.